Product Code Database
Example Keywords: battlefield -light $20
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Umalat Laudaev
Tag Wiki 'Umalat Laudaev'.
Tag

Umalat Laudaev (p=ʊməɫət ɫəʊdə(j)ɪf; 1827 — 1890s) was the first ethnographer and a Russian officer known for his only work The Chechen Tribe, published in the in 1872.


Biography
Little is known about Laudaev's life. From his personal appeal to the Russian administration, it is known that his great-grandfather was Nogai-Mirza who emigrated from Ichkeria to the where he founded an eponymous village with the Russian authorities' allowance. Both Laudaev's father and grandfather lived in the village of Nogai-Mirza-Yurt throughout their lives. Here, Laudaev was born too. From the 1886 census conducted in the village, Laudaev's age is indicated as 69 which historian Nikolai Gritsenko sees as a typo that should be read as 59. This coupled with Laudaev's other biographical information makes Gritsenko assume that Laudaev was born in 1827.

According to the folklore, Laudaev received his education at a ' school. At the age of 12, Laudaev was sent by his family to study at the Second St. Petersburg Cadet Corps. After graduating from there, he was sent to serve in the Caucasus in the 1830s. In 1862 Laudaev was already a . After his retirement, he settled in his native village, Nogai-Mirza-Yurt.


Publications
Laudaev has only one work titled The Chechen Tribe, published in the in 1872. The work was an attempt to give an idea of the past and present of Chechnya and Ingushetia. Based mainly on personal observations, as well as on folklore, linguistic and historical evidence, Laudaev mentioned daily information about the origins and settlement of the Chechen and Ingush tribes and the social system and culture of their people.

One must critically approach Laudaev's work as it contains a lot of anti-national simplification; in addition, the author was under the influence of official Russian historiography. 's works that contained newly recorded legends about the emergence of and the founding of some auls, along with materials collected by and Laudaev about the Chechens, served as the only primary sources in the absence of others that the first authors incorrectly used to judge about the history of the formation of the Chechens and Ingush. This usage of the legends was problematic as no single picture emerged due to each community and having its own traditions that were not related to each other. The typical features of the legends were that: firstly, the Chechens and Ingush in the came to their modern lands from somewhere else, and secondly, that the ancestors of individual teips came from very different regions (e.g. Georgia, Syria, ).


Notes

Sources
  • (2025). 9785867934064, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. .

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time